FFS designs
TL14.Gauss.Carbine.txt
Reading preview
Source wording preserved. The original download is available separately.
4mm TL14 Gauss Carbine (IISS)
The "IISS" Gauss Carbine was a high-tech, short-barreled weapon which
was apparently used by the Scout Service for certain special missions,
in particular by the Imperial Protection Detail (the "IISS Guard").
Firing its' half-gram round at 3800 mps, this weapon is similar in
performance to the standard tech-12 4mm gauss rifle in service with
the Imperial armed forces, but with reduced range.
Interstellarms tried to interest the Scouts in a more modern 4500 mps
carbine, but it was rejected for wide-spread use on two major grounds.
First, the older weapon is able to use standard gauss rifle magazines
in a pinch, although it does not need all the power available in the
magazine battery. Second, the newer weapon was longer, too much so
to meet a very specific and stringent length specification set by the
Service.
TL: 14
Ammo: 4x20mm/36-14
Muzzle Energy: 3610 joules (2170 J tranq), req. energy: 5776 joules
Weapon Length: 51.3 cm
Weapon Weight: 2.895 kg loaded, 2.875 kg empty (incl. empty magazine)
Weapon Price: Cr 937
Mag. Weight: 0.957 kg loaded, 0.937 kg empty
Mag. Price: Cr 2
Ammo Price: Cr 0.01 (Dart); Cr 0.02 (HE, Tranq); Cr 0.03 (HEAP)
Ammo Weight: 0.5 grams ea.
Features: Optic sights, gyroscopic stabilization; laser sight optional.
--Recoil--
Round ROF Dmg. Pen Rtg Bulk Round SS Burst Short Range
4mm/36-14 Dart 5/10 4 1-2-Nil 3 40 1 3/6 80 (66)
4mm/36-14 HE 5/10 5 Nil 3 40 1 3/6 60 (50)
4mm/36-14 HEAP 5/10 5 2-2-2 3 40 1 3/6 60 (50)
4mm/36-14 Tranq 5/10 -1* Nil 3 40 1 2/4 50 (40)
*1d6-1 plus tranq effect
DESIGNER'S NOTES:
1. Watch out in the range determination rules not to choose both
"bullpup" and "two-handed". This seems to be incorrect.
2. I found no clear instruction on how to reduce recoil for the
tranquilizer rounds. Estimates were made on how to do it from
the existing weapons designs. (Note that substitution of a
tech-12 gauss rifle magazine doesn't increase weight enough
to change the recoil figures.)
3. I believe all roundings have been done properly, but in many
cases, FF&S gives no clear guidelines.
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 10:57:51 -0500
From: bonnevil@mermaid.micro.umn.edu (Steven M Bonneville)